- #Download ibm spss 24desktop 64bit full#
- #Download ibm spss 24desktop 64bit software#
- #Download ibm spss 24desktop 64bit windows#
Lindows has quie a ways to go but, I have to admit, so far my Joe User experience has been trouble free. I’ve been in there looking, but have not had to go there to actually find a solution to a problem. The support issue seems to be the same as with Lycoris – it is the community forums that provide the only real support. Everything has worked fine in the two weeks I’ve been using it (and again, I try to use it as Joe User would).
I’ve downloaded a lot of stuff, the major things being applications like OpenOffice and Mozilla.
#Download ibm spss 24desktop 64bit software#
So far, doing things as Joe User would do them, I’ve had no problems, nothing that would put me dead in the water.Īfter getting familar with the OS and using the sparse amount of Linux software that comes installed, I’ve had no problems using Click ‘n Run.
#Download ibm spss 24desktop 64bit windows#
So, of course, I had no installation problems and it uses the entire hard drive – I have no Windows partitions.
#Download ibm spss 24desktop 64bit full#
Instead they just say “Well, we will just wait around and they can run the Windows version as soon as the compatibility works better.”Īt last, a full review of Lindows! I bought a Microtel PC with Lindows installed with the intent of using it as Joe User would, the kind of person who would see an inexpensive PC at the Walmart site and go for it. And continuing to pursue this goal is bad for Linux as it discourages developers from porting native Linux versions of their applications. Windows compatibility is a dead horse for Linux.
So as soon as they figure out, Microsoft has changed it so it breaks. #2: Microsoft changes the APIs faster than the weather changes. And they have to be EXTREMELY careful about reverse engineering the APIs anyway because that violates the Microsoft EULA and would get them sued. #1: Without having the actual API source code, this is mostly guess work. There are two primary reasons why Lindows and WINE will never achieve the goal of good Windows compatibility: And both of these products were successfule because they had actual API licenses from Microsoft and were using the real Windows API. My question is this… What made the Lindows people think that they would be able to accomplish what many many programmers have been trying to accomplish with WINE for around 10 years and have been unable to do?ĪSFAIK, the only two products that have ever successfully been able to do this were OS/2 with 16 bit Windows applications, and Soft Windows for Macintosh. “They seemed to think adding full Windows application support was a no-brainer and now it looks like they’re back-pedalling away from that as quickly as they can.”
0 kommentar(er)
